
I have to say it, this is what The Wolf of Wall Street could and should have been. A compelling look at the temptations and pitfalls of corporate capitalism in the big city. Charlie Sheen plays Bud Fox, our main protagonist who has just one goal, to get to the top of the totem pole. He meets Gordan Gekko, portrayed brilliantly by Micheal Douglas, a big fish on Wall Street who Bud quickly works out can help him get unfathomably rich. We also have Martin Sheen playing Bud's Dad Carl, a sweet touch to have him play both on screen and real life father to Sheen I thought. The story is one of greed, lust, betrayal and eventually, justice set in the cacophonous backdrop of New York City in the 1980's. What results is a very good film, full of entertainment value as well as deeper questions about this kind of big business.
It is one of the most fascinating questions of our age - can greed ever be a good thing? Within the context of the rise of capitalism in the second half of the 20th century, this is definitely a question that is worth asking. I think most people would say that greed is bad, yet much of our society revolves around it. We are taught to strive to reach our career goals without realising how quickly that can simply turn into entering a consumer driven rat race meticulously designed to make a lot of money and often, to make other people more money. The central themes of this film revolve around this idea of chains of greed. How your own greed can be used as a weapon by other, even greedier people, who want to use you to make themselves more powerful. Wall Street strives to tell a story about how futile such a philosophy is and just how quickly it can all come crashing down.
The film works primarily thanks to the strength of its lead actors, Sheen and Douglas. I gained a whole new level of respect for Sheen after watching him play this slick, quick witted business man. If only he would have continued in this direction. It is not a mind blowing performance, and perhaps not as dynamic as DiCaprio in The Wolf of Wall Street, but nonetheless his character is more believable and relatable. Micheal Douglas steals the show though. Gordon Gekko is someone you would not want to cross in real life, with his palpable ferocity and persistence driving him to infinite lengths in the name of money. As he pursues his business deals throughout the film with razor sharpness, we start to understand why this man has amassed a such cult following on Wall Street. Gekko maybe leading Bud down a road toward betraying his father and friends, but he is visibly transfixed by Gekko. He has bought wholly into the delusion. The two have great screen chemistry, one of my favourite scenes being when Bud initially pitches his idea to Gekko, establishing a clear distinction of who holds all the power. He seduces Bud with the promise of unimaginable wealth, but more crucially, power. By the end of the film though, Bud has worked out what Gekko plans to do to his fathers business and sets out on a merciless path of revenge. This kind of character development is exactly what The Wolf of Wall Street lacked, and part of why this is a much better movie.

The rest of the cast of Wall Street also did a good job. I've already mentioned Martin Sheen as Carl Fox, who acts as the only real voice of reason in the entire thing as he helps to ground the movie in something deeper than money and greed. I really liked John C. McGinley as Bud's friend and colleague Marvin, who provided a fair share of comic value to the film. The love interest Darien, played by Daryl Hannah, fit nicely into the cast, and this whole section of the movie was interesting in what it had to say about money in relation to love as well as money in relation to sex. The only thing I would say is that they could have given her character a bit more depth, instead painting her as a pretty shallow person. But this in itself was probably intentional. Visually, Wall Street is classic 80's New York, with cramped offices with CRT computes and glamorous open plan apartments hosting colourful parties for the exceedingly wealthy. It is a nice looking film, but there is nothing amazing about the cinematography. It just does the job.
There is much more I could say about Wall Street but this review would end up 10 pages long. In summation, I really admire what Stone managed to achieve with this film in terms of tone and subject matter. It is not a terribly creative movie, or particularly flashy with its imagery, but what shines through is the real humanity in it. By that I mean the range of human emotions and motives that it is willing to explore. It does not lead you in just one direction, but instead leaves you to make your own mind up about the characters. There is no happy ending, just a sobering recognition that Bud must face the consequences of his unlawful actions. As the camera pans up to reveal the vastness of the city and Bud walking up the courthouse steps, we are reminded that he is just a mortal man after all.
Characters: 80
Narrative: 85
Visuals; 70
Music: N/A
Overall: 78/100